Here is a question that makes a great many scientists uncomfortable: if consciousness is simply what the brain does, what happens to it when the brain stops? Not in a vague, hopeful sense. In a specific, documented, published-in-The-Lancet sense.

During a shamanic journey, I encountered an animal I did not recognise. It had a presence that was unmistakable, a distinct energy and character, and it communicated with me clearly. When I came back, I had to look it up to find out whether it existed at all. It did. It was a snow leopard. This is not the usual starting point for a discussion of the problem of other minds. The usual starting point is Descartes, or Wittgenstein, or the philosophical literature on analogy and i

In shamanic journey, you are fully present. Not chemically altered, not surrendered to a substance's trajectory, but consciously travelling into non-ordinary reality while remaining the author of the journey. This distinction is not merely procedural. It is the difference between being taken somewhere and choosing to go.

I've known things before they happened. Not vague premonitions or lucky guesses, but specific, verifiable information about future events. This shouldn't be possible according to our everyday understanding of time. The future doesn't exist yet. You can't know what hasn't happened. Causation flows forward, not backward. The past influences the future, never the reverse. And yet.